Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (GAS6) and the protein C pathway

Growth arrest-specific protein 6 (GAS6) shares a high degree of similarity with protein S (PS), a cofactor for the protein C (PC) anticoagulant pathway. PS consists of an N-terminal γ-carboxyglutamic acid (Gla) domain, a thrombin-sensitive region (TSR), four epidermal growth factor-like domains and a large C-terminal sex hormone-binding globulin-like domain. The TSR loop, which is not present in GAS6, is a prerequisite for PS cofactor activity and facilitates the binding of the Gla domain of PS to the membrane phospholipids of activated platelets, endothelial cells, and platelet microparticles, where the PC anticoagulant pathway is manifested. It is predicted that GAS6 does not have a cofactor role similar to that of PS for the anticoagulant activity of activated protein C (APC) [1,2]. However, it is rather premature to exclude a possible interaction between GAS6 and PC/APC. Recent studies suggest that the PS Gla domain itself may interact directly with the Gla domain of APC on cell membrane surfaces. The Gla domains of PS and GAS6 have the highest sequence homology among all the modules. Seven out of a cluster of nine amino acid residues in the Gla domain of PS that have been identified as being of critical importance for putative binding to the APC Gla domain are identical in the GAS6 Gla domain (Leu21/Arg28/ Asn33/Asp34/Pro35/Tyr41/Leu45), whereas the other two residues are highly conserved (Asn23/Lys24 in PS; Ser23/ Arg24 in GAS6) [2,3]. The Gla domain of APC also interacts directly with the endothelial protein C receptor, forming a stable complex initiating protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1)-dependent and PAR-1-independent PC cellular signaling pathways that are distinct from the PC anticoagulant pathway and have pleiotropic cytoprotective effects. It has been recognized increasingly that the clinical success of APC for the treatment of severe sepsis is attributable, at least in part, to the PC signaling pathways. Two recent studies revealed that the level of plasma GAS6 was elevated and was correlated with disease severity in patients with severe sepsis [4] and septic shock [5]. However, significantly different levels of plasma GAS6 between the two studies (56 to 139 ng/ml [4] and 1.5 to 164 pg/ml [5]) were reported on the basis of a similar enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The lack of a control group of healthy subjects in the report by Gibot and coworkers [5] prevents a direct comparison of both studies. In addition, it would be interesting to analyze the correlation between GAS6 concentrations and the …